Refresh

0 Hits

Theilen

European Consensus between Strategy and Principle

The Uses of Vertically Comparative Legal Reasoning in Regional Human Rights Adjudication
Nomos,  2021, 497 Pages, E-Book

ISBN 978-3-7489-2509-5

0,00 € free of charge
129,00 € incl. VAT
E-Book download

Go to the open access download
Add to notepad
 Further options for registered users

englischThis study offers a critical account of the reasoning employed by the European Court of Human Rights, particularly its references to European consensus. Based on an in-depth analysis of the Court’s case-law against the backdrop of human rights theory, it will be of interest to both practitioners and theorists.

While European consensus is often understood as providing an objective benchmark within the Court’s reasoning, this study argues to the contrary that it forms part of the very structures of argument that render human rights law indeterminate. It suggests that foregrounding consensus and the Court’s legitimacy serves to entrench the status quo and puts forward novel ways of approaching human rights to enable social transformation.

The work was awarded the Hermann Mosler Prize of the German Society for International Law.

»Many insights which stand on their own feet, and one can read this normative position as a sign of intellectual (and political) honesty of the author who is simply open about their internal motivations and views. In that sense, there is no stone that remains to be turned, including the author’s position, which will – one can expect with excitement – be further developed and defended in future work.«
Bosko Tripkovic, CML Rev. 2023, 1189
Find reading samples of the current title in PDF format here:
Find the cover of the current title in PDF format here:
Find further material on the current title in PDF format here: